I think common sense would stipulate that you thought you were sober enough to drive and not harm others. I would also argue that as soon as you decided to take up arms and become an enemy combatant you have accepted the risk of torture (Ask and POW*).Hmm I like the hypo. What level of drunk are we talking? Fall asleep at the wheel and possibly kill self, friend, and others or just over the legal limit?
If I'm passed out I have no choice to make, if I'm just over the limit then hell yeah I'm taking him to the hospital. Now the consequence of that would hopefully just be a DWI and no harm to others. It would also have been a choice I made that did not effect anyone else. Torture is a choice made for someone else against their will. The tortured individual suffers consequences not by any personal choice vs me dining and driving would be my choice to gamble punishment.
Boy, you leave the room for a few days and look what happens. 'Hate to admit it but I really just skimmed over the stuff. My interest in politics has waned greatly now that we have some adults in the room. Okay may not act like adults all the time but have adult principles in mind.
As far as Muslim's cultivating hate. One of my best friends in High School was the oldest son of 13 children. The father was a Palestinian and the mom an Italian Catholic. The father was a great guy with the exception of hating all Jews - he tried to instill that in his kids but the mom was too powerful to let that shit settle in too deep.
One nice thing about me spewing my opinion for so long, I feel no need to share right now because I think you all know where my heads at. Love me or hate me, I'm good with that.![]()
So there is a kid down the street and he was on my daughters soccer team a few years ago. Kid was a shitbag.. would stop playing and sit on the field, throw his little chair onto the field after the game ala Bobby Knight, kick over water bottles... just a turd. Parents not much better, very nice home, nice cars... when these things happened the parents could care less. NEVER said stop or get over here... nothing. Well at the end of the season the coach handed out all the trophies. Kid down the street never showed up to get his. Coach gives his to me because he knows he is a neighbor. I threw it in the trash.
District 9 in San Fran Komifornia strikes again. Fuckheads.
Most overturned court of the land. Douche bags for sure.
They wouldn't understand the blood, sweat and tears that went into the Original Documents. These douche bags think they smarter than our God directed founders.Those damn liberal lawyers...
The hypothetical was presented as a situation that you would break the law to save lives...like torture used to extract information. You can then extrapolate outward that our government will risk breaking the law to save millions of lives. I'm not saying that they shouldn't be charged of war crimes but the preservation of human life is the highest "law" of our civilization and if done for a just cause should usurp other laws (but consequences can still be realized).Ah, I did not assume anything for the hypothetical. Well then yeah, I would certainly drive. That is still me only making a decision that is for myself though. I would agree with that, if you play the game you have to be ready to lose sometimes. However, torture is not strictly used on POW or anyone related to the army, could be anyone.
This is one of those claims you make without any basis of fact...what branch are we trying to take away? how is Trump acting like a dictator? What are we not questioning him on? You see how it makes no sense? Its just an antagonistic statementYou guys are going on and on about wanting America to be great and follow the constitution. The constitution divides the powers to the three branches and you want to take away one of those branches? Shit, talk about unconstitutional and unAmerican. You guys want trump to have a dictatorship and be able to do whatever he wants without question. Talk about sheep.
Not so clear, he actually read the LAW that grants him the powers he is exercising as POTUS. He is not trying to circumvent the court, just bringing attention to how politicized they have become and are legislating from the bench...which ironically IS actually against the constitution.Lol, my apologies, it was meant to include the individuals it pertained too. I'm webbing, not lawyering
Very clearly the judicial branch. trump claims the EO is un-reviewable by the judicial branch and therefore they have no say in it. That is a direct violation of the system of checks and balances granted by the constitution.
In short, he is saying he has the power to do what he wants with an executive order and can make one that the judicial branch cannot review. That goes against the constitution. If you need me to explain it another way I will happily do so.
that will never happen. I pass ASTM's HQ almost weekly...maybe Ill stop in and ask 
You know, this ignore function, or whatever we call it, is a very nice feature.
Now for a PSA for the snowflakes among us...